Comments posted organically
SelectSmart.com Homepage
Display Order:

Republicans: Do you know where your political donations are?
Politics by Curt_Anderson     April 24, 2024 6:12 pm (Rating: 0.0) Last comment by: oldedude (9 comments) [382 views]

The Oval Office Oaf calls for "Four more years. Pause."
Entertainment by HatetheSwamp     April 24, 2024 2:56 pm (Rating: 0.0) Last comment by: HatetheSwamp (6 comments) [108 views]

Trump, Giuliani, Meadows are unindicted co-conspirators in Michigan fake elector case, hearing reveals
Law by Curt_Anderson     April 24, 2024 4:53 pm (Rating: 0.0) Last comment by: Indy! (4 comments) [63 views]

Turley: The "haymaker" in Supreme Court arguments. Chief Justice Roberts. "Openly mocking of DC Circuit."
Law by HatetheSwamp     April 26, 2024 5:59 am (Rating: 0.0) Last comment by: Indy! (8 comments) [189 views]

pb's Legal Goobers #s 2 & 3: The NY v Trump case is collapsing
Law by HatetheSwamp     April 26, 2024 3:43 am (Rating: 0.0) Last comment by: HatetheSwamp (4 comments) [27 views]

The latest general election polls from this weekend reveal something interesting.
Politics by Curt_Anderson     April 22, 2024 11:03 am (Rating: 0.0) Last comment by: HatetheSwamp (10 comments) [423 views]

So Ukraine got money.
Military by oldedude     April 24, 2024 3:58 am (Rating: 0.0) Last comment by: Indy! (6 comments) [92 views]

Donna may be getting her wish granted: Gateway Pundit to file for bankruptcy
Law by Curt_Anderson     April 24, 2024 7:28 pm (Rating: 0.0) Last comment by: Indy! (1 comments) [37 views]

James Comer hopes for divine intervention to save him from embarrassing impeachment fiasco.
Politics by Curt_Anderson     April 24, 2024 7:05 pm (Rating: 0.0) Last comment by: Indy! (2 comments) [81 views]

Russia is even more furious over vote by Congress to support Ukraine than MTG.
Politics by Curt_Anderson     April 21, 2024 6:09 pm (Rating: 0.0) Last comment by: oldedude (11 comments) [643 views]

Law selectors, pages, etc.
I am predicting that it's gonna be 8-0 finding that Trump is fullashit.
By Ponderer
December 12, 2023 7:10 pm
Category: Law

(0.0 from 0 votes)
Rules of the Post
SelectSmart.com SelectSmart.com SelectSmart.com


Rate this article
5 Stars
4 Stars
3 Stars
2 Stars
1 Star
0 Stars
(5=best, 0=poor)

The Supremes will be unanimous in denying that a former president has legal immunity after leaving office. And that there was no double jeopardy, since he hasn't been criminally tried for anything about 1/6 before.

Comments Start Below


The views and claims expressed by contributors are their own and do not necessarily reflect the views and beliefs of SelectSmart.com. Not every statement made here can be assumed to be a fact.
Comments on "I am predicting that it's gonna be 8-0 finding that Trump is fullashit.":

  1. by Curt_Anderson on December 12, 2023 7:15 pm
    I am watching Lawrence O’Donnell now. 25 years ago Justice Kavanaugh wrote an opinion that directly contradicts Trump’s hope and his lawyers' arguments on immunity and double jeopardy.

  2. by HatetheSwamp on December 13, 2023 1:44 am

    There's such a sweet naive hope about your TrumpHate.

    Jack Smith's Desperate Gamble at SCOTUS

    After falsely pretending that Trump is being prosecuted like any other defendant, Biden's henchman Jack Smith just proved what a liar he is. On Monday Smith filed an unusual emergency appeal directly to the U.S. Supreme Court, which would be laughed out of court if Smith were treated like any other litigant there.

    While the 3-justice liberal wing of the Supreme Court will surely grant whatever Smith wants, and perhaps Roberts will too, that totals only 4 votes when he needs 5 to obtain fast-track review in bypass of the intermediate appellate court. Smith appears to be one vote short, which liberals recognize by baselessly demanding recusal of conservative Justice Thomas.

    Bahahahahahahahahahaha ha!
    townhall.com

  3. by islander on December 13, 2023 7:25 am

    Ponderer, I'm not worried about the vote on this. I'm just curious as to how many, if any, would actually vote to give a president that kind of power especially as, I hope, most Americans are beginning to see that we need to start limiting the president and Supreme Court's power. It's gonna' be interesting.

  4. by Curt_Anderson on December 13, 2023 9:23 am
    Legal pundit Andrew Weissmann pointed out an inconsistency in Donald Trump’s arguments of presidential immunity. Trump argues that as a one-time president he should not be subjected to the intrusive and time-consuming aspects of a criminal trial, which interferes with his political campaign. However, that does not square with his delaying tactics and his numerous and frivolous appeals which consume time and overshadow his political campaign.

    I will add my own thought: when has an innocent person ever been so insistent on delaying the wheels of justice and the opportunity to be found not guilty in a court of law?


  5. by HatetheSwamp on December 13, 2023 10:09 am

    Curt,

    I'd hardly call Weissmann an unbiased legal scholar.

    isle,

    This decision is purely a matter of answering the question of where the appropriate boundaries are in the Constitution's separation of powers. This GOP nominees are Originalists. That's all that will matter to them, either way.

    Gang,

    Unlike po, I ain't a law school professor and a former Supreme Court clerk, however, my sense is that Trump's lawyers are merely throwing up Hail Marys which have little chance of scoring.

    I can't see that my Legal Goobers have weighed in on this specifically but...

    ...#3, Andy McCarthy, actually predicts that Trump will be in prison on election day...

    ...and, #1 Alan Dershowitz, continues to predict that Trump will be convicted on the DC charges and that conviction will be overturned after the election.

  6. by islander on December 13, 2023 11:13 am

    Curt, In my opinion of course Trump is right. His indictment and trial will interfere with his campaign. I doubt there are many who could possibly argue against that.

    When a person is indicted for a crime it’s going to interfere with virtually every aspect of their life including running for a public office.

    There is no precedence or law that I've ever heard of that would make a former president immune from or give him the power or the right to delay a criminal trial any more than any other private citizen. Whether or not he has chosen to run for public office again or not is irrelevant. An ex-president is still a private citizen just like you or me.

    Even if the court chooses not to take the case which I guess could happen...I doubt Trump could delay the trial until after the election, which is as we all know, exactly what he’s trying to do.







  7. by HatetheSwamp on December 13, 2023 11:35 am

    When a person is indicted...

    Apparently, when a person is indicted, it's as if s/he is given a bag of gold. When these indictments began to pile up, Trump had a slight lead over Ron DeSantis. Now, his lead is historic and insurmountable...over the whole GOP primary field.

    ...AND, stunningly, he has caught and passed the Doddering Old Fool in head to head match up as well.

    I think most people assumed that the indictment would impact Trump's candidacy...just not as it has.

  8. by Curt_Anderson on December 13, 2023 11:49 am
    "When a person is indicted for a crime it’s going to interfere with virtually every aspect of their life including running for a public office." --islander

    Exactly. Indictments and trials would get in the way of anyone's professional and personal life.
    For Sherlock Holmes an indictment would be detection interference.
    For would-be parents an indictment would be conception interference.
    For wedding planners an indictment would be reception interference.
    For the sexually active an indictment would be erection interference.

    For Donald Trump, the one thing an indictment is NOT is deception interference.



  9. by islander on December 13, 2023 11:55 am

    Just saw the news that the Supreme Court has accepted the case !!

  10. by Curt_Anderson on December 13, 2023 12:06 pm
    Are you sure Islander? I think it will be weeks before the decide. SCOTUS has just agreed to hear the abortion pill case.

  11. by islander on December 13, 2023 12:51 pm









    You might be right Curt. We had just been talking about this case and I might have jumped the gun !!

    The abortion pill case will be another good one.



















    yY

  12. by oldedude on December 13, 2023 6:54 pm
    😴😴😴😴😴😴😴😴😴😴😴😴😴😴😴😴😴

Go To Top

Comment on: "I am predicting that it's gonna be 8-0 finding that Trump is fullashit."


* Anonymous comments are subject to approval before they appear. Cookies Consent Policy & Privacy Statement. All Rights Reserved. SelectSmart® is a registered trademark. | Contact SelectSmart.com | Advertise on SelectSmart.com | This site is for sale!

Find old posts & articles

Articles by category:

SelectSmart.com
Report spam & abuse
 SelectSmart.com home page